Comparative analysis between brazilian and canadian eletronic democratization: the Dialoga Brazil and Suggest a Dataset

Autores

  • José Luís Bizelli São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara – SP – Brazil
  • Thaís Conte Vargas São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara – SP – Brazil
  • José Anderson Santos Cruz São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara – SP – Brazil.

Palavras-chave:

Eletronic governance. e-democracy. Dialoga Brasil. Suggest a Dataset.

Resumo

This article aims to promote a discussion on a comparison between two electronic governance instruments, consubstantiated in two digital platforms: Dialoga Brasil and Suggest a Dataset - Canadian site, where citizens can demand specific information. To do so, it performs an initial conceptualization of the terms used throughout the research, as well as it presents a detailed analysis of both Internet portals. A history of the Internet use in both countries is also demonstrated considering both the access and the use of ICT by the respective governments. We intend to demonstrate how national politics (the paths chosen by the governing authorities, as well as the solidity of institutions and democratic regimes) influences the process of consolidating e-democracy.

Keywords: Eletronic governance. e-democracy. Dialoga Brasil. Suggest a Dataset.

Biografia do Autor

José Luís Bizelli, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara – SP – Brazil

Associate Professor, School of Sciences and Languages (FCLAr/UNESP) – Brazil; Postgraduate Program in School Education. Research Productivity Scholarship Level 2 – CNPq. National Coordinator FEPAE. ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-1444. E-mail: jose.bizelli@unesp.br

Thaís Conte Vargas, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara – SP – Brazil

PhD Student in School Education, School of Sciences and Languages (FCLAr/UNESP) – Brazil. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8127-5257. E-mail: thaiscontev@hotmail.com

José Anderson Santos Cruz , São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara – SP – Brazil.

PhD in School Education, School of Sciences and Languages (FCLAr/UNESP) – Brazil. Collaborator Advisor ESALQ/PECEGE. Deputy Editor of Journals and Technical Assessor in Scientific Journals Management. CAPES Scholar. Editor in charge of the Editora Ibero-Americana de Educação. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5223-8078. E-mail: anderson.cruz@unesp.br

Referências

ABELSON, J. et al. Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens’ perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, Londres. V. 9, n. 4, p. 205-212, out. 2004. Available in: http://hsr.sagepub.com/content/9/4/205.abstract. Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

ACCENTURE. The Government Executive Series – e-Government Leadership: Leadership in Customer Service: New Expectations, New Experiences. 2005. Available in: http://www.accenture.com/Countries/Canada/Services/By_Subject/Customer_Relationship_Management/R_and_I/LeadershipNewExperiences.htm. Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

BIZELLI, J. L. Reforma Administrativa do Estado e Governança Pública nas Cidades Brasileiras. Temas em Administração Pública, Araraquara, v. 1, n. 1, 2007. Available in: http://seer.fclar.unesp.br/temasadm/article/view/6112. Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

BIZELLI, J. L.; CINTRÃO, L. P. Inovação, governança pública e desenvolvimento local. In: CASAGRANDE, E. E. (Org.). Intervenção fiscal e suas dimensões: teoria, política e governança. São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2012. v. 1, p. 225-247.

BRASIL. Dialoga Brasil. Presidência da República. Secretaria-Geral. Secretaria Nacional de Participação Social. Available in: http://dialoga.gov.br/. Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

BRASIL. Presidência da República. Secretaria de Comunicação Social. Pesquisa brasileira de mídia 2015: hábitos de consumo de mídia pela população brasileira. Brasília: Secom, 2014. 153 p.

CANSIM Database. Statistics Canada. Table 358-0132. Canadian Internet use survey, Internet use at home, by sex and government on-line (GOL) activity, every 2 years (percent). Available in: <http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&retrLang=eng&id=3580132&pattern=Canadian+Internet+use+survey%2C+Internet+use+at+home%2C+by+sex+and+government+on-line&tabMode=dataTable&srchLan=-1&p1=1&p2=-1>. Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

CHADWICK, A. Bringing e-democracy back in. why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review, v. 21, n. 4, p. 443-455, nov. 2003. Available in: <http://ssc.sagepub.com/content/21/4/443.abstract.>Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

FRISCHTAK, L. L. Governance capacity and economic reform in developing countries. World bank technical papers, jun. 1994. Available in: <http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/0-8213-2962-6.> Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

GOMES, W. A democracia digital e o problema da participação civil na decisão política. Revista Fronteiras – estudos midiáticos, São Leopoldo. v. 7, n. 3, p. 212-222, set./dez. 2000. Available in: <http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/6394>. Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

GOVERNMENT ONLINE. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. 2003. Available in: <http://www.gedgol.gc.ca/rpt2003/rpt00_e.asp.< Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

IRVIN, R. A.; STANSBURY, J. Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review, v. 64, n. 1, p. 55-65, fev. 2004. Available in: <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x/abstract.> Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

KNIGHT, P. T. et al. (Org.). E-desenvolvimento no Brasil e no mundo: subsídios e Programa e-Brasil. 1. ed. São Caetano do Sul: Yendis Editora, 2007.

KUMAR. V. et al. Factors for Successful e-Government Adoption: a Conceptual Framework. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, v. 5, n. 1, p. 63-76, 2007.

LIBERATO, F. P.; ROTHBERG, D. Comunicação pública, transparência e políticas públicas: avaliação de informações em portais brasileiros de governo. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, Málaga, v. 3, n. 6, p. 69-96, jul./dez. 2013. Available in: <http://revistarelacionespublicas.uma.es/index.php/revrrpp/article/view/232.> Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

NÚCLEO DE INFORMAÇÃO E COORDENAÇÃO DO PONTO BR. Centro Regional de Estudos para o Desenvolvimento da Sociedade da Informação – Cetic.br. Pesquisa sobre o uso das tecnologias da informação e comunicação nos domicílios brasileiros [livro eletrônico]: TIC domicílios 2014. São Paulo: Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil, 2015. Available in: http://cetic.br/publicacao/pesquisa-sobre-o-uso-das-tecnologias-de-informacao-e-comunicacao-nos-domicilios-brasileiros/. Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

VIEIRA BRAGA, L. et al. O papel do Governo Eletrônico no fortalecimento da governança do setor público. Revista do Serviço Público, Brasília. V. 59, n. 1, jan./mar. 2008, p. 05-21. Available in: <http://seer.enap.gov.br/index.php/RSP/article/view/137/142.> Access in: 26 oct. 2015.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-03-21