THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF AUTOMATIC CONVERSION OF PRISON INTO PREVENTIVE

AN OVERCROWDED PRISON SYSTEM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58422/releo2024.e1548

Abstract

Due to the excessive number of people incarcerated in Brazil, it is necessary to reflect on this ongoing model of mass incarceration, which destroys lives and does not promote resocialization. Therefore, this research proposes to analyze the institution of preventive detention in light of the Anti-Crime Package, focusing on the ex officio conversion of flagrant detention into preventive detention, analyzing its impacts on the Brazilian prison system, as well as its disharmony with the accusatory system. It should be noted that the conversion of arrest in the act into pre-trial detention by the judge is a delicate and socially important topic, which needs to be understood based on the Brazilian prison crisis, triggered by overcrowding and, based on the Anti-Crime Package, which in prisons precautionary measures recognizes the magistrate's passivity regarding the decree of preventive detention. Therefore, the question is, what is the impact(s) of the automatic conversion of flagrant arrest into preventative arrest? The research hypothesis is that the automatic conversion of flagrant arrest into preventative arrest ends up further increasing the number of people incarcerated. The answer to the research problem will be based on the inductive method, bibliographical and documentary research, which aims to analyze the impacts of the judge's automatic conversion of arrest into preventative arrest. This research has the general objective of critically analyzing the impacts of the automatic conversion of flagrant arrest into preventative arrest, as well as describing the magisterial stance that is expected in the accusatory system.

Author Biographies

Antônio Leonardo Amorim, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul

Professor do Curso de Direito da Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS, Campus do Pantanal - CPAN, Cidade de Corumbá/MS, Doutor em Direito na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, bolsista CAPES (2022/2023), Mestre em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (2017-2019), bolsista CAPES (2017-2018), Especialista em Direito Penal e Processo Penal (2017-2018), pesquisador colaborador no projeto de pesquisa Cárcere e Fronteira. E-mail: antonio.amorim@ufms.br.

Francisco Quintanilha Veras Neto , Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Doutor em Direito das Relações Sociais pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (2004), Pós-Doutor em Direito pela UFSC (2014). Atualmente é professor Titular da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina nas disciplinas de Filosofia do Direito e Teoria do Direito II. Professor permanente no programa de Mestrado e Doutorado em Direito da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. E-mail: quintaveras@gmail.com. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1620-6017

Karoline Bassi Huber, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso

Bacharel em Direito pela Universidade Estadual do Mato Grosso - UNEMAT (2021), Pós Graduada em Direito Constitucional pelo Instituto Brasiliense de Direito Público - IDP (2022), atualmente Servidora do Tribunal de Contas do Estado do Mato Grosso - TCE/MT (2022).

Published

2024-08-30